Laura's Law -- California Assembly Bill 1421 (AB 1421)
This page mirrors http://www.psychlaws.org/StateActivity/California.htm as of 1/1/2003.
Text of AB1421: http://oceanpark.com/notes/ab1421.html
For additional information, visit the Treatment Advocacy Center Home Page.
UPDATED NOVEMBER 22, 2002
Gov. Davis Signs Laura's Law
AB 1421 will help those with severe
mental illnesses who are too sick to help themselves
Laura's Law, which will become effective January 1, 2003,
allows court-ordered, intensive outpatient treatment for people with severe mental
illnesses who refuse medication because their illness impairs their ability to make
rational decisions. In those counties that adopt one, an AB 1421 program will ensure that
everyone has the right to live in a world free of psychotic delusion.
Read the Treatment Advocacy Center's new guide to the
legislation (in HTML
or PDF).
Read more in a Nov. 15 article in Psychiatric News, Law gives California
counties commitment authority, or browse the information on this page.
READ MORE
TAC
statement
Followup Oct.
2 editorial in the San Francisco Chronicle
Technical information on the bill from the CA
legislature
Gov. Davis' press
release
Coverage of passage
by the Los Angeles Times and San
Francisco Chronicle
A last-ditch Sept. 28,
editorial by the Los Angeles Times
Passage of AB 1421 brings hope to tens of thousands of people.
The coalition supporting its passage over these past few years was extraordinary and
included ...
FAMILY MEMBERS "My
mother has been showing signs of the illness schizophrenia for seven years or more. It
tears me up inside everyday that when I look into my mother's eyes, they aren't hers
anymore. She is removed from all that she once knew about the world. She has turned into a
recluse and produces accusations of espionage everyday. ... My life would be so completely
wonderful if that bill becomes a reality. I could have my mother back in some form or
another."
- Name withheld, as author is only 16, letter to
TAC
JUDGES "These
persons wander the streets hungry, homeless, and without hope. They cycle through our
hospitals and are released with no assured after-care or plan to meet their human needs --
and, all too often in my experience, wind up in our jails and prisons, not because they
are criminals but because there simply is no place for them in our society."
- Judge Harold Shabo, letter to the
Governor, Sept. 2002
LAW ENFORCEMENT
"It is society's job to help those who cannot help
themselves. Nobody knows this better than law enforcement officers. And nobody knows more
than we do the dangers of facing down a person who has had a psychotic break, who is not
rational, who may believe we are aliens or that we mean them harm."
- California police chiefs Bernard
K. Melekian and Joseph Santoro, June 2002
LEGISLATORS "I
hated this bill when it was first introduced four years ago," said local state Sen.
Martha Escutia, D-Norwalk, chairwoman of the powerful [judiciary] committee [that passed
the bill]. "But, now I am confident that the due process protections are there at
every step of the way to protect their rights."
- Whittier News, Aug. 14, 2002
EDITORIAL BOARDS "Based on New York's "Kendra's Law," AB 1421 achieves
a delicate balance between a society's responsibility to protect the safety of its
citizens and an individual's right to absolute freedom."
- San Francisco Chronicle,
July 31, 2002
EDITORIAL BOARDS Imagine a train wreck that scatters passengers across the landscape.
Paramedics arrive and begin loading the injured onto stretchers. But when anyone screams
out in pain, "No! Don't touch me!" the medics nod compassionately and leave that
person sprawled amid the rocks and cactuses. A similar scene has been unfolding on the
urban landscape for the last 40 years. People with severe mental illness, tossed from
state hospitals, have landed on public sidewalks and in wretched urban encampments. And no
one helps them because they say they don't want help.
- Los Angeles Times,
April 14, 2002
RESEARCHERS
"We concluded that outpatient commitment can help
an individual adhere to a beneficial regimen of psychiatric treatment, and may also
influence the mental health service system by getting case managers more invested in
outreach, in mobilizing resources and in leveraging more services on behalf of a
patient."
- Los Angeles Times, Jeff Swanson,
May 1, 2001
PARENTS "If people overwhelmed by severe mental illness, like Abrams
[who killed the author's 4-year-old daughter], were instead placed in mandated community
treatment, they could get well enough to knowingly exercise and enjoy their civil rights.
Meanwhile, our right to live in a safe and secure society would be protected."
- Los Angeles Times, Cindy Soto, Jan.
27, 2001
SIBLINGS
"My parents lived in sorrow and fear for their
youngest child. They died without being able to get her the help she needs. Even the late
Assemblyman Frank Lanterman realized, after observing the unintended effects of the
legislation he sponsored, that this law had come to 'prevent those who need care from
receiving it.'"
- Los Angeles Times, Norah Schumacher,
June 11, 2000
ACTIVISTS
"Had my sister-in-law been provided treatment
under the criteria and structure proposed in AB 1800, the cost to the state might have
been $20,000. Instead, expenses for her trial and restricted hospitalization are close to
$2 million."
- Los Angeles Times, Carla Jacobs,
July 13, 2002 |
WHY REFORM? Before Laura's Law was signed,
California law forbade the provision of care to thousands overcome by mental illness,
ignoring what has been learned about and the vastly improved medications developed for
mental illnesses in the three decades since the original law was passed. The old law -
which compared
poorly to standards in many other states - championed the right to be sick
over the right to be well. People rendered incapable of making rational decisions had to
be an immediate danger to themselves or others before the law would permit any type of
intervention - nothing could be done if a person overwhelmed by mental illness was not
actively dangerous. Interventions were essentially limited to short inpatient stays. You
no doubt have seen the results on our streets and in our headlines. Until Laura's Law was
signed, California did not have the less intrusive mandated community treatment programs
available in most states.
About the
California Treatment Advocacy Coalition
about
CTAC | new from CTAC | fact sheets | action alerts | editorials
| op-eds
articles & columns | state legislature documents | how CTAC began
New
- TAC's Guide to Laura's Law, California's law for assisted outpatient treatment (in HTML or PDF).
- ARTICLE Counties Weigh Pros,
Cons of New Legislation (The Press-Enterprise, Dec. 2, 2002)
- NEWS Law gives California
counties commitment authority (Psychiatric News, Nov. 15, 2002)
- EDITORIAL Followup:
Laura's Law (The San Francisco Chronicle, Oct. 2, 2002)
- EDITORIAL Governor: Sign
Laura's Law (The Los Angeles Times, Sept. 28, 2002)
about
CTAC | new from CTAC | fact sheets | action alerts | editorials
| op-eds
articles & columns | state legislature documents | how CTAC began
Fact Sheets
The California Treatment
Advocacy Coalition (CTAC) is dedicated to helping those lost to the symptoms of severe
mental illness. The Coalition is working to change California's laws so that they promote
the care of those rendered incapable of making informed medical decisions by mental
illness. CTAC has worked to support a reform of the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (LPS), the
hopelessly outdated legislation that governed when and how Californians who are overcome
by mental illness can be placed in needed treatment. Their efforts have been a huge
success, as Laura's Law was signed by the governor Sept. 28. More about
CTAC ... |
about
CTAC | new from CTAC | fact sheets | action alerts | editorials
| op-eds
articles & columns | state legislature documents | how CTAC began
CTAC
Action Alerts
Virtue
rewarded (April 11, 2002)
ARCHIVES
CTAC Action Alerts on 2001 Campaign for AB 1421
ARCHIVES
CTAC Action Alerts on 2000 Campaign for AB
1800
about
CTAC | new from CTAC | fact sheets | action alerts | editorials
| op-eds
articles & columns | state legislature documents | how CTAC began
Newspaper
Editorials Supporting LPS Reform
"The
sort of court-ordered treatment programs Laura's law would permit, far from confining
people to oppressive hospitals, actually cut hospital admissions by more than half, reduce
the number of people living on streets and in parks and help seriously mentally ill people
stay on new medications. ... civil libertarians have fought fiercely to kill it in the
committee. In fact, since its introduction more than two years ago, AB 1421 has been
amended numerous times to provide comprehensive civil rights protections"
- Los Angeles Times editorial, "Last
boost on Laura's Law," June 12, 2002 |
NEW!
The San Francisco Chronicle, Oct. 2,
2002
Followup: Laura's Law
The Times-Herald, Oct. 2, 2002
Laura's Law
The Los Angeles
Times, Sept. 28, 2002
Governor, sign
Laura's Law
Oakland Tribune, Sept. 2 4, 2002
Mental health care
bill deserves support
The Los Angeles Times, Aug. 26, 2002
Honoring Laura's
legacy
The Los Angeles Times, Aug. 2, 2002
For the ill - For
all of us
The San Francisco Chronicle, J uly 31, 2002
Pass
"Laura's Law"
The San Jose
Mercury News, July 8, 2002
Say yes to help:
Mentally ill don't have to sink deeper into delusion; State Senate should restore AB 1421
and pass it
about
CTAC | new from CTAC | fact sheets | action alerts | editorials
| op-eds
articles & columns | state legislature documents | how CTAC began
Opinion Editorials Supporting LPS Reform
"In
California, you have the right to act crazy and destroy your life, and Marie Elise
exercised that right
Unfortunately, she killed someone at the same time."
- Dwight Bergquist, the last therapist of a Californian woman who suffers from
bipolar disorder and is charged with murder. Read more from this LA
Times magazine story. |
- The Los Angeles Times, February 7, 2001
They are free to die on our streets
- The Los Angeles Times, January 27, 2001
Mandate treatment for mentally ill?
- The Los Angeles Times, November 13,
2000
Waiting for danger can prove deadly to the mentally ill?
- IGS Reports, September 1, 2000
Mental health reform
is stymied in the California senate
- The Los Angeles Times, July 13, 2000
Why sit by when we can help?
- The San Francisco Chronicle, July 6,
2000
Sen. Burton's actions will
only hurt the mentally ill
- The Los Angeles Times, June 11, 2000
Law is impediment to mental health care
- The San Diego Union-Tribune, February
16, 2000
It's time we help California's helpless
- The Los Angeles Times, May 27,
1999
... And getting help shouldn't be
this hard
about
CTAC | new from CTAC | fact sheets | action alerts | editorials
| op-eds
articles & columns | state legislature documents | how CTAC began
Articles and
Columns
- Counties Weigh Pros,
Cons of New Legislation, The Press-Enterprise (Riverside), December 2, 2002
- Law gives California
counties commitment authority, Psychiatric News, November 15, 2002
- Prelude to a death:
Those who watched Marie Elise West's manic spiral saw a collision coming. But under
existing California law, there was little they could do to stop it, The Los
Angeles Times, May 5, 2002
- Treatment is what will set
free the mentally ill, The Los Angeles Times, May 6, 2001
- Mental health advocates
debate use of forced care, The Los Angeles Times, April 6, 2001
- Untreated mental illness
can be criminal, The Los Angeles Times, November 3, 2000
- Systems gaps can
endanger some of countys mentally ill, The Desert Sun, March 28,
2000
about
CTAC | new from CTAC | fact sheets | action alerts | editorials
| op-eds
articles & columns | state legislature documents | how CTAC began
Official
Documents from California State Legislature on Assembly Bill 1421
Bill text, status, voting records, and analyses are available on the California
Assembly website. Go to that site,
type "1421" into the window marked "Bill
Number," and click on "Search."
about
CTAC | new from CTAC | fact sheets | action alerts | editorials
| op-eds
articles & columns | state legislature documents | how CTAC began
How CTAC
Began
A grassroots task force comprising mental illness advocates,
physicians, constitutional lawyers, social workers and law enforcement officials unveiled
a landmark white paper on February 16, 1999, on the need for reform in California's
involuntary treatment laws. LPS Reform: A New Vision for Mental Health Treatment
Laws takes sharp aim at the inadequacies of the state's antiquated
Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (LPS).
WHITE PAPER
LPS Reform: A New Vision for Mental
Health Treatment Laws
LPS Reform Task Force, February 16, 1999
STATEMENT
The Treatment Advocacy Center outlines its position on LPS reform in "California Must
Strengthen LPS Act for Mentally Ill"
Treatment Advocacy Center, February 16, 1999
STATEMENT The California Treatment Advocacy Coalition outlines specific
reform initiatives in their statement "California Must Care For, Not Criminalize the
Severely Mentally Ill"
California Treatment Advocacy Coalition, February 16,
1999
General Resources / Legal Resources / Medical
Resources / Briefing Papers / State Activity
Hospital Closures / Preventable
Tragedies / Press Room / Search
Our Site / Home

Treatment Advocacy
Center
|
The contents
of all material available on the Center's website are copyrighted by the Treatment
Advocacy Center unless otherwise indicated. All rights reserved and content may be
reproduced, downloaded, disseminated, or transferred, for single use, or by nonprofit
organizations for educational purposes only, if correct attribution is made to the
Treatment Advocacy Center. Please feel free to call with questions on mental
illness, treatment laws or the benefits of medication compliance at 703.294.6001 or send
questions via email to Info@psychlaws.org.
Write to us at: The Treatment Advocacy Center; 3300 N. Fairfax Drive; Suite
220; Arlington, VA 22201. Technical comments on the Center's website
(www.psychlaws.org) can be sent to Webmaster@psychlaws.org.
The Treatment Advocacy Center is an I.R.C. § 501(c)(3) tax-exempt corporation.
Donations are appreciated and are eligible for the charitable contribution deduction under
the provisions of I.R.C. § 170. |
|