Gattinara - Just one of the many neglected Nebbiolo wines

Filed under: WINE — Tom C August 29, 2007 @ 2:01 pm

A view of Gattinara

Barolo, Barolo, Barolo, Barbaresco, Barbaresco, Barolo, Barolo, Barbaresco, Barolo, Barolo, Where are your Barolos? I love Barolo. Barbaresco is like Barolo, right? Barolo, Barolo, Barbaresco, Barolo…

In my opinion, wines like Barolo, Barbararesco, Amarone, and Brunello, as great as they are, hold far too big a wedge of the Italian wine pie. With the nearly limitless variety that Italy possesses, it’s just short sighted and parochial to only drink these expensive, gold-plated appellations. And then we can go a level deeper…If folks know anything about Nebbiolo, they know that Barolo is made from this grape. I’d guess that about half of this number also know that Barbaresco is also made from 100% Nebbiolo. Once you’ve passed this signpost, the knowledge about Nebbiolo just drops off the shelf, and that’s a shame.

Nebbiolo is unquestionably one of the WORLD’s most “noble” grapes - Its color, aroma, flavors, and the places in which it can be grown are rarified and quite particular. The variety is absolutely and irrevocably linked to its birthplace of Piedmont in northwestern Italy. And despite many attempts to cultivate this variety elsewhere (California, Argentina, New Zealand et al.) results have ranged from satisfactory at best to COMPLETE, rapid failure - like planting the vines, and watching them die outright in the span of only a couple of years. To say that Nebbiolo gets homesick is one of the greatest understatements in the wine world. Some day, someone might overcome the great difficulties that growers have encountered in cultivating Nebbiolo outside of Piedmont, but thus far the results weighed against the costs and difficulties just don’t come out for most growers, so Nebbiolo often gets ripped up almost as fast as it went in…

So let me introduce you to Gattinara. Gattinara is one of the many, other-than-Barolo-and-Barbaresco, Nebbiolo-based wines that also hail from Piedmont’s hallowed soils. Other such appellations include Ghemme, Carema, Boca, Sizzano, Fara, Lessona, and Bramaterra…yes, all those, (and all of them are in Piedmont) and if one includes neighboring Valle d’Aosta and Lombardia, there are almost that many more! Of all of these “other” appellations, Gattinara is undoubtedly the most famous, and the one with the greatest reputation.

Believe it or not, before WW II, Gattinara held the place that Barolo now holds in terms of prestige. Traditionally, Gattinara, which sits quite a bit further north and east of the two “big B’s”, was the area that was best known for, and more heavily planted to Nebbiolo. The areas in and around the Barolo and Barbaresco zones had always been associated with the cultivation of Nebbiolo, but never to the degree that Gattinara was.

In Gattinara, the local name for Nebbiolo is Spanna , and the current DOCG regulations do allow for the addition of up to 15% of two local grape varieties - Uva Rara and Vespolina - in any percentual combination. These grapes are softer and fruitier than Spanna (Nebbiolo), and consequently can be useful in rounding out the final wine in colder, leaner vintages which are a bit more common this far north. Of late however, as climates continue to warm, and as growers learn more about clonal selection, fewer and fewer growers choose to include any Uva Rara or Vespolina. In terms of elevage, Gattinara, like Barbaresco, must be aged for a minimum of three years, one of which must be in wooden barrels, while Barolo requires at least 4 years of aging.

So why get up on a soap box about an oenological “also ran”? Well, for one thing, this “second best” status is mostly undeserved. Gattinara can be, and is often as good as its more famous neighbors - just as profound and complex, but due to differing soils, climate, and history, just DIFFERENT. But, with perception being the lion’s share of reality, Gattinara, if known to consumers at all, is thought of as a lesser thing. But not surprisingly, there’s a silver lining here, and I think that you can guess what it might be…yes, I think heard it from someone in the back…it is indeed PRICE. Now this is not to say that Gattinara is CHEAP, but it often costs less than half of what many Baroli (the Italian plural) do, and usually about 50% less than most Barbareschi (pronounced “Bar-bar-ESS-ki - the Italian plural again). So if QPR or “bang for the buck” are criteria that are high on your list, get to know Gattinara. If however, you want at all costs to cultivate a snobby edge, or just LOVE spending more than you have to for the wines you drink, by all means stick with the Baroli…obviously, my tongue is planted firmly in my cheek, but I do it to make a point, and that is not to let your buddies or collegues or your family who read a few wine rags cast aspersions on your selections because they’re not sexy or enough of a status symbol. Gattinara offers another “take” - and a great one I might add - on the nearly endless story that is Nebbiolo, so why not avail yourself of it, and keep a few extra bucks in your pocket while you do?

Just a short note - I’m taking a few days off across the labor day weekend, so I won’t be posting again until September 3rd, so until then, be well, and drink good wine!

TOM CIOCCO

Got Gattinara?

7 Comments »

  1. First, thanks for a cool lesson in Italian wine, Gattinara specifically. It’s cool how much I learn on your blog! My taste buds (and wallet, today) thank you.

    Second, no posts until September 3rd!!! You deserve a break, but I’m going to have to look for a good book on Italian wine for these kinds of breaks (got any suggestions?)

    Comment by Orion Slayer — August 30, 2007 @ 12:37 pm

  2. Tom,

    Thanks for the endorsement of Gattinara. I’ve read that the quality of Gattinara and Ghemme has begun to rival that of Barolo and Barbaresco and I would like to try them, but I haven’t been able to find any in my market. I’ve also noticed Nebbiolo d’Alba getting more attention. Do you have an opinion on how they compare to Barolo and Barbaresco?

    Your topic reminds me of the relationship between Brunello di Montalcino and Rosso di Montalcino. Andrea Robinson refers to Rosso di Montalcino as “baby Brunello” and defines it as containing the grapes that didn’t quite make the cut for the Brunello.

    A friend of mine visited a Brunello producer this summer who made a point to assure my friend that his Rosso was in no way inferior to his Brunello. My friend was told that no distinction was made in the grapes that went into each wine, only in the aging regimens. The Rosso was merely made in such a way as to be more approachable in its youth.

    What do you make of this? Is this producer an exception? Or, is this the approach taken by most Brunello producers? Or, was this just a savvy producer, marketing his “second” wine?

    Enjoy your long weekend!

    Comment by Kent Benson, CSW — August 30, 2007 @ 2:47 pm

  3. Great blog topic - love Gattinara! ‘97 Travaglini was one of my favorites and a steal at the time.

    Comment by mas — August 31, 2007 @ 6:47 am

  4. Kent-

    The easily measurable differences between Brunello and rosso is indeed exclusively about aging requirements, HOWEVER, in most cases, it is the unseen elements that also make a difference. In most cases, rosso di Montalcino is made with either the fruit from younger vines, or the “second cut” of fruit from the older vines. There are a few very high end Brunello producers who use the EXACT same fruit for both Brunello and rosso, but this is far fronm the norm.

    TOM CIOCCO

    Comment by Tom C — September 4, 2007 @ 9:32 am

  5. Thanks, Tom. Any opinion on Nebiollo d’Alba vs. Gattinara, Ghemme, Barolo, Barbaresco?

    Comment by Kent Benson, CSW — September 4, 2007 @ 4:33 pm

  6. Kent-

    Nebbiolo d’Alba can vary widely depending on producer and vintage. Some producers take their Nebbiolos quite seriously, while to others it’s just an afterthought - one piece of advice - buy Nebbiolo d’Alba in BAD Barolo, Barbaresco vintages - it’s often de-classified juice from those wines (that didn’t get made because of concerns over quality)

    Also, the permissable yields, the average ages of the vines, the level of triage, etc. all favor the the prestigious appellations of Barolo, Barbaresco, Ghemme, Gattinara over the less “ambitious” Nebbiolo d’Alba.

    TOM CIOCCO

    Comment by Tom C — September 4, 2007 @ 4:52 pm

  7. Tom,

    I’m drinking the Nervi 2000 Gattinara for this first time and love it. Thank you for the article on this grape varietal. I will be buying more soon for sure!

    Tom

    Comment by Tom T. — September 30, 2007 @ 5:46 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment