Chapter 2 in a series on mental illness.
[bottom] [ch.1] [ch.2] [ch.3] [ch.4] [ch.5] [ch.6]
[Note: this article includes excerpts of Tony Allard's writing about his own mental illness.]
Today, in court, Tony was deemed competent to stand trial. So, even though he was delusional when he took a woman’s purse, threw it to the ground and walked off without out taking anything or harming anyone, next Tuesday, August 23, 2009, he goes on trial on a charge of felony robbery. He faces a sentence of up to 17 years in prison, since he has one strike on his record for a prior conviction of stalking. In short, although what my brother and society needs, is for him to be treated for a mental illness, he may end up serving time in prison.
Tony, who was diagnosed as paranoid schizophrenic twenty three years ago, refused to agree that he was mentally ill for the first twenty of those years. In recent years he was able to gain explicit “insight” (as it is called) into his condition. Yet, when he goes off his medications, he seems to lapse into a state of delusion and resents me for using those words to describe his condition. And I can’t say that I blame him. Although he has a condition that makes him different than “normal” people, it also causes him to be more bluntly honest about the world and what he sees as wrong in the world than most normal people ever dare to be. I have learned much from his blunt honesty in those periods.
When Tony is on his meds, he seems as normal as you and I. Many of his friends think he is one of the most brilliant people they know. They find his presence enjoyable. He is insightful, writes and speaks articulately and insightfully, and is fun to be around. He is a good video editor and has produced very creative works. He has worked in Hollywood as a machinist for our brother Eric, who does special effects. Yet Eric will no longer hire him in recent years since Tony becomes paranoid and does not fit in at the work place.
Because Tony goes off his meds, his condition prevents him from fitting into society or maintaining a steady job in spite of his ardent desire to be normal and have a job and be part of what normal people do. It is a contradiction. His condition is not “normal” and his behavior becomes obnoxious. He comes to believe he is well and goes off his medications. Yet his desire to be normal is prevented by his going off his medication.
He has never hurt anyone physically but he is six foot four, weighs 230 pounds, and goes into raging tirades so can be very intimidating. He has targeted many individuals, including some very well known personalities (including Blase Bonpane, Michael Miner, Susan Block, and Steven Spielberg’s mother) and numerous other people, including me, our 91 year old mother’s care givers, and some of his friends. He has delusions about people that he expresses in writing or in phone calls to the point that people take out restraining order against him. In one case, he made so many harassing phone calls to a certain personality’s office that they filed charges of stalking which resulted in a felony conviction. Tony ended up spending nearly two years at Atascadero State Mental Hospital. That hospital stay helped him. Upon leaving the hospital he was very stable, very rational, and appeared to many as if he had been “cured”. Were you to meet him you would think he was a totally normal highly intelligent person and quite likable. His release was some three years ago.
Unfortunately, his “cure” was short lived. Twice since his release he went off his meds and ended up being kicked out of his living place. First time from a one bedroom apartment where he was living on his own in Korea town, then the next time from an apartment where his roommates ended up having to lock him out to retain their own sanity. It was after this most recent eviction that he became homeless and committed the alleged crime for which he will go on trial next week.
I have been attending the pre-trial hearings. In a way, I, his brother, have become his case manager. I will report here on the trial when it happens next week. In the meantime, I had wanted to provide a letter to the judge in the trial, Teri Schwartz. However, I learned from the public defender, Jose Colon, that the judge will not accept information from sources outside the context of the trail, i.e. not from either the public defender or the district attorney. The purpose of my letter is to present the point of view that Tony had a mental illness and that the charge of robbery and a subsequent incarceration is not a good substitute for the medical treatment he requires. Since it was not possible to provide the letter to the court at this time, I am choosing to publish it here in a public forum. I will let it speak for itself.
Re: Case GA07600501
Honorable Teri Schwartz
Pasadena Superior Court
Pasadena, CA
Dear Judge Schwartz:
I am the brother of George Anthony Allard, Tony to his friends, who has a mental illness yet is in your court on a charge of felony robbery for an act that any normal person would not describe as robbery. While delusional, he snatched an old ladies purse, threw it to the ground and walked away. For this act he is facing up to 17 years in prison.
Tony was first diagnosed with Paranoid Schizophrenia in 1985. Since you are the presiding judge in his case on a felony charge of robbery, I write to bring to your attention facts and history that should bear upon the case and for which I am in the best position to provide relevant details, since I have been acting as his de facto case manager in recent years.
Whatever the letter of the law, the interest of justice is surely served by bringing facts and positions to light that would otherwise remain unknown. I have been witness to legal proceedings involving my brother for many years. So, although I am aware, as a lay person, that a system of prosecution and defense exists to convey information to the court, I feel compelled to provide information and a point of view often not adequately considered in trials where mental illness is, or should be, a predominant factor.
My brother Tony faces a second strike felony conviction of robbery. Yet at the time of the alleged crime he was delusional. Tony had gone off his meds four months prior to the alleged robbery, resulting in a number of 5150s and a 5250 stay at Harbor UCLA Psychiatric ward. I had been discussing Tony’s condition in detail with social worker Matt Wells and Dr. Walker of Harbor UCLA and exploring the idea of placing Tony under a state controlled conservatorship. The preliminary steps toward a conservatorship were starting to fall into place. Then, on February 13, 2009, Judge Melissa Widdifield of the Los Angeles Mental Health Court found “for” Tony and denied a request by the psychiatrists and social workers at Harbor UCLA to keep him for further observation. Tony was, ipso facto, released, i.e. put back out on the street. He was quite delusional at the time. He had told me a few days before that he was, indeed, an agent working for the FBI. Upon his release to “freedom”, he immediately proceeded to Hollywood Park race track where he gambled away whatever money he had and remained homeless. The alleged robbery in Glendale occurred nine days later, on February 22.
There are times when Tony is taking his meds and is highly functional. There are times where he is just recently back on them or a new medicine and is able to “present well”, which was the case before the Mental Health Court and very possibly before your court. And there are times where he is off his meds and is completely delusional. When in a functional state, he has written about his own condition and history.
The following excerpts from my brother Tony Allard’s writings are illuminating…
I thought that I was world famous, and that everybody in the hospital, doctors, nurses, and patients alike, were all talking about me all of the time. This was and is not unusual for me, at that time, and even to some extent to this day, for when I am or have been at work or at play on the outside, I have and have had similar delusions. Everybody, wherever I go, is or was preoccupied with me. Glorious me. Oh the delusion. It is hard for me to even think about those days anymore, when the delusions where as concrete as a freeway overpass, but now that I have been stabilized on meds for several years it is not the same. However, the delusions are never that far from my consciousness. Even to this day, whether I’m on the bus or in a restaurant, in a crowded theater or in traffic driving on the street, I often have delusions that people nearby are talking about me in a tangential way. I don’t think I’ll ever really get beyond it, it’s so deeply ingrained in my consciousness, but I can hope, and I can and must and do just ignore those thoughts. What else can I do, after all, because I cannot just stop my thinking processes. I have a constant inner dialogue, like everybody else, only mine is skewed with some elements of fantasy that make it scary sometimes to just be me. Because intermingled with those delusions that people are talking about me, I sometimes also think that they are saying that I will be killed by so and so, an old friend of mine or someone else, or that I will end up committing suicide. These thoughts are not my own and they are not somebody else’s. I don’t know where they are from, but I do know that the medication that I am on now, Risperdal, make such thoughts much less prevalent in my thinking. But they are always there. I guess it’s probably like someone who has been raped or has been through a war zone and has Post Traumatic Stress syndrome. I don’t know, but I don’t like it, and I only know that I have to live with it for now, and hope that some day these thoughts just fade away and stop coming back. But after more than 20 years, I doubt that they will ever go away completely. It is probably a lot like an insomniac who, despite his best efforts and the best medications, every night must face the same dilemma of going to sleep. Only in my case, it’s not sleep that won’t come, it’s just simple peace of mind.
o o o
I would have constant delusions while working or off of work about people “talking about me” and I would just have to ignore my ears. Sometimes, I just resorted to wearing foam ear plugs so that I couldn’t hear conversations near me second hand and suffer the fears that resulted from my psychotic misinterpretations of what people were saying. .I don’t know how common it is for bi-polar patients to have such delusions, but I had them. I was diagnosed at that point as Psychotic Disorder NOS (Not Otherwise Specified). That had come after years of a Paranoid Schizophrenic diagnosis, but I believe that my Psychiatrist, Thomas Carter, thought that I was too high functioning to be considered truly Schizophrenic. Whatever it was, it wasn’t fun. My social life was still somewhat active, and I would, as I’ve said, just ignore my aberrant thoughts and pretend that everything was fine. Many people, from that time of my life, have told me that I must be a very good liar, because it was never apparent to those friends and acquaintances that I was having constant delusions during that period. Of course you learn to lie when you are mentally ill, because if you don’t, you cannot function in a “normal” life.
o o o
At some point around New Years Day, 2004, I decided again to stop taking my meds. As I rationalized it, I was not drinking alcohol or smoking marijuana, or taking any other drugs, and besides, as is common among mentally ill people, I was feeling fine because I was on Risperdal and consequently deluded myself into believing that I was no longer mentally ill. (If I were to say the one biggest problems, for me at least, and I know for many other if not most of the mentally ill, is coming to terms with the fact that your illness is permanent and requires lifelong treatment with psychotropic medication.) Consequently, my mental condition started to deteriorate rapidly. I started to suspect people were “talking about me” again and had several persistent delusions relating to some old acquaintances and my belief that I was a Special Agent for the FBI. My brother Dennis, who had seen me deteriorate in a similar manner several times in the past, noticed my deterioration, but I lied to him and assured him that I was still taking my meds.
The above excerpts indicate not only an ability on the part of my brother to be rational and write coherently, in sharp contrast to much of his writings and poems in a large opus of documents I have compiled (and can make available to the court), they also constitute an admission by Tony that he lies to hide his illness or being off his meds.
Tony may be “competent to stand trial”. But beware. The mental illness he is afflicted with is, to use an analogy, like a computer virus that takes over a computer. Except in this case, it is a form of consciousness that takes over a host human being’s psychology and thought processes. The behavior of the host victim may seem on the surface to be normal and rational at some standard of competency. Yet, since the virus is not my brother, it follows the standard cannot apply. There is no jurisprudence of which I am aware that applies. If that is true, that leaves the court in a bit of a bind. It is like a body snatcher in the movie “Invasion of the body snatchers”. There is no sense that the pronouns “he” or “him” or even the name “Tony” refers to my brother at the those times that the body snatcher has control. Worse, the virus acts in a way to defend its existence, duping its host victim into experiencing things that are not happening (delusions) and causing the host to claim to be sane, duping his friends, relatives, his lawyers, and the entire judicial system including you yourself, your honor, with all due respect.
I’ve seen this happen before and it is happening again. It is the pitiable state of affairs whereby the police, judicial, and prison system in California are acting in lieu of medical treatment for a medical condition and engaging in a charade following a script of rules that do not or should not apply.
Recommendation:
What can be done to better the situation in a just manner? In my opinion, a just solution would involve imposing (not “offering”) a supervised treatment program and living situation on my brother, a kind of probation with parole, that provides him with the ability to seek employment while further imposing the condition that if he violates various conditions of his parole, such as going off his meds or committing unlawful acts, he would be subject to incarceration at a secure institution such as Atascadero State Hospital. I believe that my brother would be responsive to such a solution even if he is not capable of agreeing to such treatment voluntarily. The result would be just, practical, cost effective, and in some cases ultimately rehabilitating. I urge the court to consider this course of action if at all legally possible.
Dennis G. Allard
Santa Monica, CA
August 14, 2009
[ story continued: http://oceanpark.com/blog/2009/08/not-guilty-so-now-what/ ]
Although you cannot present your letter during the trial, perhaps you can share this information during the sentencing.
My intention had been to submit the letter prior to sentencing.
However, that became moot when the verdict was not guilty on the main charge of robbery. And there was no time to submit the letter prior to sentencing on the lesser charges since the sentences were issued forthwith immediately after the verdict.
I plan to send a version of the letter to the judge in any case to inform her what happened subsequent to the trial.
Dear Dennis:
I hope your brother is doing better & thanks for sharing this experience! I am in a similar situation with my brother. He was also charged with a felony & the mental illiness history is quite similar. After almost 2 yrs of mental rehabilitation at prison state hospital to gain competency, his public defender is looking to settle for a guilty plea; which does not make sense to me….. Any way, thanks for sharing this & best of luck to you and your brother.
Hello,
I know next to nothing about law, but can’t believe a lawyer wouldn’t use 20+ years of documented evidence for your brother’s MI. And I guess since your brother was deemed competent for trial, he would have to be the one to request a different lawyer? Maybe if you gathered the documentation to prove the length and severity of your brother’s illness you could be placed over him so that you could fire the next lawyer?
It is a shame that people within the legal system(especially judges) aren’t required to become educated about serious mental illnesses, as they seem to believe people w/schizophrenia must hallucinate or be delusional 24/7.
His lawyer, Jose Colon, told me introducing Tony’s history of mental illness would have lead to bringing in his entire case history, including his past conviction on a charge of stalking. Mr. Colon told me that might have swayed the jury more toward a guilty verdict on the robbery charge. Realize that the judge and the jury, along with the rest of society, are ignorant about mental illness. Why else in cases such as Virginia Tech or Fort Hood do we hear the question “why did this happen?”, as if reason has anything to do with it. When mental illness is involved, reason goes out the window. Yet, many in society continue to impute rationality on persons suffering from the illness.
You are correct that my brother would have to ask for a different lawyer. Most often my brother does not want a lawyer but the judge does not permit him to represent himself. In this case he liked his lawyer. My brother often states that he is not mentally ill. I think at some conscious level he realizes his condition but denies it, although denial is not really the operative term here so I use it loosely. In a sense, this trial went the way my brother “wanted” it to go, to the extent I can refer to what is happening in my brother as being the desires of my brother.
I think the judges and lawyers are partly victims of the broken system, while being perpetrators of it at the same time. In a true, sense, the body of jurisprudence simply is inapplicable to mental illness, yet I see no effort to change the situation.
I wish your brother much luck. I read that you were trying to gain conservatorship after I had posted above.
From the little I have studied about schizophrenia, it is possible that there are times your brother could have insight that he is ill, and at other times lose insight as a delusion becomes fullblown.
I recently presented a paper (grad student) and wish I had found this blog beforehand, but I did cover some of the more common myths about the disorder. Situations like your brother’s make it obvious that there is a need for public awareness/education.
sorry to hear about your bros situation. It sounds to me the problem is financial, schizophrenia and poverty are co-existing symptoms. If financial hardship was not part of your brothers life, perhaps he could organize to avoid the triggers of the illness, as the information illness is corrupted by the pressures of the environment, and poverty and fear, exacerbate the condition over time. Perhaps a pschologist, or anger management, might be a better choice than forcible confinement or anti-liberty bargaining positions over time. Good luck with the judge.
my son has been found incompitant to stand trial by 3 doctors while a 4th (jail) dr. says he’s lying his lawyer has now after 9 months of rule 11 hearings has now decided its too costly & jail time would be longer top keep gouing with rule 11 so he has bound my mentally ill son of 6 yrs. back to criminal court where he is getting no help from his lawyer or any one else what do i do????????????? please help
Dennis, I read this case with great interest. I found you because I am teaching a graduate class in adult psychopathology and found your interview of your brother on youtube. This is a heartbreaking situation and I am so sorry for the problems Tony faces because of a pervasive lack of understanding about mental illness.
Thank you for posting the interview on youtube. Hopefully, one student at a time, we can help defeat prejudice and misunderstanding about mental illness.
What happened with Tony?
Sincerely,
Valerie Hale PhD
MY GRANDSON IS INCARCERATED. HE IS NOT A CRIMINAL. HE DOES NOT GET UP IN THE MORNING AND SAY TODAY I WILL COMMIT A CRIME. HE IS GUILTY OF NOTHING, SITUATIONS THAT YOU OR I WOULD GET A SLAP ON THE HAND FOR. BECAUSE HE HAS PRIORS EACH LITTLE EPISODE BECOMES BLOWN OUT OF PROPORTION. THE POLICE ESCALATE INCIDENTS THAT ARE NOTHING. THEY HAVE TO MUCH POWER, AND ARE SUBJECT TO THEIR OWN RREJUDICES.
THE SYSTEM IS BROKEN. POOR GUYS DON’T HAVE A CHANCE. THE PROSECUTORS ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN CONVICTIONS TO HELP THEIR CAREERS, AND PUBLIC DEFENDERS ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN CLEARING THEIR
CALANDERS. IF YOU CAN’T AFFORD A LAYWER YOU ARE SCREWED.
THERE IS NO HELP FOR THOSE WITH MENTAL ILLNES, THEY ARE THOWRN IN WITH HARDEN CRIMINALS AND ARE FUTHER ABUSED BY THE SYSTEM.
my best friend has been in an Anger Management class for 2 months now, he improved a lot when dealing with anger.;-,
Anger Management does not apply in my brother’s case because when he goes off his meds he is not rational and does not think logically or reason about things in a way that leads to dealing with the real issue. This is a disease that affects his ability to think.
You told your brother in the video that you were going to show it to him in a week. Did he, in fact, see it at some later time, possibly in a different state of mind? If so, I’m curious as to what his thoughts were about it.
He has not seen it to my knowledge. He has been incarcerated for much of the time since it was made and, when in liberty, has been delusional. Currently (July 2010) he is in a hospital and stable but does not wish to talk with me.